Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3
93 Imaging
37 Features
51 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf3de/cf3de1a3483ec268aad03e9778cb7e8a2bb7f476" alt="Canon PowerShot S110 front Canon PowerShot S110 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 198g - 99 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched September 2012
- Succeeded the Canon S100
- New Model is Canon S120
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Replaced the Olympus SH-2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the S110 (12MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the S110 (1/1.7") and SH-3 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The S110 was launched 4 years before the SH-3 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the S110 scores vs the SH-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S110 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The complete galleries are available at Canon S110 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S110 over the Olympus SH-3
S110 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Canon S110
SH-3 | S110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | September 2012 | More modern by 41 months |
Common features in the Canon S110 and Olympus SH-3
S110 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon S110 offers physical measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Look at the Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the S110 vs the SH-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6269b/6269bfabdb5eaa90c850b62f7415a782fb18d5c0" alt="Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S110 and SH-3 is 93 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98b2c/98b2c7cda243536dffffd07e22e307c5c40c663d" alt="Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison"
Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over specs. The pic underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the S110 and SH-3.
All in all, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The S110 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus SH-3 will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged S110 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81be2/81be2d1b87778d9f93d1f6e6215b274e92f1aa79" alt="Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison"
Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9738b/9738b323d28a599c9cf06563ad0682ccf9dd2c64" alt="Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon S110 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S110 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot S110 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2016-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 5 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT PureColor II G Touch screen LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 198g (0.44 pounds) | 271g (0.60 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 48 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 168 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | 380 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-5L | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $299 | $579 |