Canon S110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
93 Imaging
36 Features
51 Overall
42
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Canon S110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 198g - 99 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched September 2012
- Older Model is Canon S100
- Refreshed by Canon S120
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon S110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Canon S110 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the S110 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the S110 (1/1.7") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S110 was announced 16 months prior to the WG-4 GPS which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the S110 matches up vs the WG-4 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon S110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot S110 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Canon S110 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S110 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| S110 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Canon S110
| WG-4 GPS | S110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | September 2012 | More modern by 16 months |
Common features in the Canon S110 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| S110 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Canon S110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Canon S110 offers external measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Canon S110 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the S110 against the WG-4 GPS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S110 and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon S110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The picture here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S110 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The S110 with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will offer you extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged S110 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Canon S110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon S110 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S110 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S110 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT PureColor II G Touch screen LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 198 gr (0.44 lbs) | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 48 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 168 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $299 | $210 |