Canon S120 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
92 Imaging
37 Features
57 Overall
45
90 Imaging
39 Features
60 Overall
47
Canon S120 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F1.8-5.7) lens
- 217g - 100 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced November 2013
- Earlier Model is Canon S110
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
- Announced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon S120 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2: The Ultimate Small Sensor Compact Showdown
When you’re a photography enthusiast scouting for a compact camera, it’s easy to get swept up in the specs battle. But for me - after testing thousands of cameras over the years - the real story is always about how those specs translate into everyday shooting, whether you’re capturing candid street snaps, epic landscapes, or even dabbling in videos. Today, I'm diving deep into two intriguing small sensor compacts aimed at very different niches: the Canon PowerShot S120, announced late 2013, and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 from early 2014.
Both cameras are compact, pocketable, and designed for enthusiasts wanting better image quality than a smartphone without hauling around a full-fledged mirrorless rig. But beneath their seeming similarities lie meaningful differences in sensor size, lens reach, controls, and software ecosystems. I’ve spent weeks side-by-side shooting portraits, landscapes, macro, and even video on both, so let’s jump right into the nitty-gritty.
Body and Handling: Size, Ergonomics, and Control Layout
The very first thing you notice holding these two is how different they feel in your hands - and no, I’m not just talking about the weight. The Canon S120 sticks to the classic compact camera design with a sturdy, rounded body, nuanced controls, and a small footprint that fits easily into a jacket pocket or purse.
The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2, on the other hand, adopts a tablet-like form factor. It’s taller and considerably wider, with a big, bright touchscreen dominating the back, making it feel more like a camera-meets-smartphone hybrid. It’s definitely less discreet for street photography but quite inviting if you’re fond of touchscreen interfaces and apps.
Check out this size comparison, and you’ll see what I mean:

The Canon’s smaller physical dimensions (100 x 59 x 29 mm, 217g) make it much more pocket-friendly compared to the Galaxy’s 133 x 71 x 19 mm and heftier 283g. If you’re planning a day-long travel shoot juggling multiple bags or hopping on a plane as a carry-on minimalists’ camp member, the S120’s compact, light design will be friendlier.
Top Deck and Button Layout: How Controls Affect Shooting Flow
Ergonomics go beyond size - control placement and tactile feedback matter for intuitive operation in the field, especially when you don’t want to tap through menus mid-shoot. The Canon S120 sports dedicated dials for shutter speed and aperture, plus a handy control ring on the lens barrel for manual focusing or zooming depending on your setting.
Samsung went a different way, opting for a clean top deck with minimal buttons plus an extensive touchscreen UI. While swiping through settings can be intuitive once you get used to it, tactile shooters craving “clubs for thumbs” will find the Canon’s physical controls far more satisfying - and faster for adjusting exposure without fumbling.
Here’s a look at the top decks side-by-side for reference:

For street photography or fast-paced shooting (like sports or wildlife), the Canon’s traditional camera control layout offers better operability. The Galaxy Camera 2 is more at home in relaxed, creative shooting sessions where detailed menu navigation or instant photo sharing takes priority.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Let’s talk image quality - after all, pixels and sensor prowess are what separate a fun toy from a serious photographic tool. The Canon S120 features a 1/1.7" BSI-CMOS sensor measuring roughly 7.44 x 5.58 mm with a sensor area just over 41 mm². The sensor resolution clocks in at 12.1 megapixels, offering a balance between noise control and image detail.
The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 uses a smaller 1/2.3" sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm; about 28 mm²) but ups the pixel count to 16 megapixels. While you might be tempted by this bigger MP number, remember that packing more megapixels onto a smaller sensor can mean more noise, especially in low light.
Here’s a detailed sensor size and resolution comparison:

In practical terms, the Canon’s larger sensor area allows for better dynamic range - meaning it can capture brighter highlights and deeper shadows without losing detail - a big plus for landscapes and portraits. The Canon’s DxOMark scores back this up: a solid 56 overall score with impressive color depth and low-light ISO performance.
The Galaxy Camera 2’s sensor is known to struggle more at ISO above 800, resulting in noisier images, but still provides decent detail in bright conditions. However, because Samsung never submitted this camera for DxOMark evaluation, the exact comparison metrics are uncertain.
When testing side-by-side in various lighting, I saw the Canon giving a consistently cleaner, richer file. For photographers prioritizing image quality in tricky lighting, the S120 wins hands down.
Lens Characteristics and Versatility
Now, lenses - where these two small compacts reveal strikingly different personalities.
- Canon S120’s lens: 24-120mm equivalent focal length with a bright f/1.8 aperture at wide end, tapering to f/5.7 at full telephoto.
- Samsung Galaxy Camera 2: Much longer zoom at 23-483mm equivalent (21x optical zoom), with a maximum aperture of f/2.8-5.9.
The Canon’s wide 24mm coverage pairs beautifully with the bright aperture to create creamy bokeh and lets in more light, ideal for portraits and indoor shooting. Its modest 5x zoom keeps you versatile for travel but doesn’t sacrifice optical quality. The built-in optical image stabilization helps steady those shots nicely, especially in handheld low light or macro scenes (minimum focusing distance around 3cm).
The Galaxy Camera 2, by contrast, stuns with its 21x zoom beast - motorized and impressive for shooting wildlife or distant subjects without lugging a huge DSLR and telephoto lens. But that comes at a cost: the lens is slower at the wide end (f/2.8 vs f/1.8) and suffers in low light, and the 10cm minimum macro focusing distance limits extreme close-ups.
Both cameras provide optically stabilized zoom lenses, but the Samsung’s longer zoom range begs for some tripod support or at least a steady hand to avoid softness at full reach.
For a frame of reference on focal lengths and apertures:
| Feature | Canon S120 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 24-120mm equiv. | 23-483mm equiv. |
| Max Aperture | f/1.8 - f/5.7 | f/2.8 - f/5.9 |
| Macro Focusing Range | 3 cm | 10 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Optical, yes | Optical, yes |
Display, Live View, and User Interface
On a camera without a viewfinder, the LCD screen is your playground for composing, reviewing shots, and navigating menus. Here we see one of the clearest divides between the Canon S120 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2.
The Canon offers a 3-inch fixed TFT PureColor II touchscreen with 922k dots resolution. It’s bright with good color accuracy, and while it doesn’t tilt or swivel, the touch interface lets you select focus points or scroll quickly.
Samsung doubles down with a massive 4.8-inch HD Super Clear touchscreen at 1037k dots resolution. It feels more smartphone-like - a swiping, pinch-to-zoom, tap-everything experience that will resonate with anyone used to Android devices.
If you value precise, tactile camera controls over touch menus, Canon’s screen will satisfy you more. But if you want a bold, big interface that doubles as a media-consuming device with Android OS capabilities (more on that soon), Samsung’s display steals the show.
Here’s a side-by-side look at the backscreens:

Autofocus Systems and Shooting Responsiveness
From portraits to sports, autofocus (AF) speed and accuracy directly impact your shooting success. The Canon S120 employs 9 contrast detection AF points, including face detection, with continuous, touch, tracking, and single AF modes. It can do AF tracking at up to 12 FPS burst shooting, making it pretty zippy for a compact camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 has a more basic AF system using contrast detection as well but without continuous or tracking autofocus modes, and no face or eye detection. Its burst rate maxes out around 5 FPS, slower than Canon’s.
In real-world tests, the S120 nails focus more consistently, especially for moving subjects, portraits, and low-light conditions where the Galaxy sometimes hunts or hunts longer. While neither will substitute for a pro-level autofocus system, Canon’s implementation is far more versatile for diverse shooting conditions.
Image Stabilization: Keeping Shots Sharp On The Go
Both cameras feature optical image stabilization (OIS), a must-have for handheld zoom shots or low-light shooting. Canon’s system has proven effective, especially when paired with their fast lens and faster shutter speeds, allowing for sharper images without a tripod.
Samsung’s OIS does its job well but is stretched thin at the long end of that massive zoom range. In practical terms, faster motion or windy conditions will challenge the stability on the Galaxy more than the Canon.
Video Capabilities and Multimedia Features
Video shooters will find some interesting trade-offs here.
The Canon S120 records Full HD 1080p at 60 or 30 FPS with good color and detail, benefiting from the bright lens. It outputs clean H.264/MPEG-4 files but lacks an external microphone port, making audio capture a weak point.
Meanwhile, Samsung targets multimedia creators with its Android-based OS, large touchscreen, and built-in WiFi/3G/4G connectivity for instant sharing. The Galaxy Camera 2 also records 1080p video but at 30 FPS max, not quite the smoothness offered by Canon at 60 FPS. However, Samsung includes a microphone input jack, ideal for vloggers or content creators wanting improved audio on the go.
Neither camera supports 4K video or advanced cinematic features but suffice well for casual video blogging or travel clips.
Storage, Battery Life, and Connectivity
On the practical side, both cameras accept memory cards, but note the differences:
- Canon S120 uses SD/SDHC/SDXC cards.
- Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 only supports microSD/SDHC/SDXC cards.
While the Canon battery life rates around 230 shots per charge, the Galaxy’s built-in battery stretches to about 400 shots - thanks in part to its larger capacity and efficient processor. However, the Galaxy’s battery is non-removable, which can be a dealbreaker for extended trips.
Connectivity wise, this is another split: Samsung offers WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, GPS, and full Android app integration - a compelling ecosystem for someone who wants smart features baked in. Canon includes built-in WiFi but lacks Bluetooth or NFC, making image sharing less seamless but still straightforward with paired devices.
Real-World Performance in Photography Genres
Let’s break down how each camera performs across key photography styles:
Portrait Photography
- Canon S120 - Bright f/1.8 wide aperture allows for pleasing background separation and bokeh. Reliable face detection AF and decent color depth make skin tones natural and flattering.
- Galaxy Camera 2 - Smaller sensor and slower max aperture limit shallow depth-of-field effects and subject isolation. Face detection exists but isn’t as snappy.
Landscape Photography
- Canon S120 - Solid dynamic range and natural color reproduction shine here. The 24mm wide angle is usable, while handling and compactness make it a solid travel companion.
- Galaxy Camera 2 - The smaller sensor struggles in high-contrast scenes, and longer zoom isn’t vital for most landscapes. Plus, the larger size is less pocketable for hikes.
Wildlife Photography
- Canon S120 - Limited by a 120mm maximum zoom, but fast AF tracking and burst shooting help snag crisp shots of closer animals.
- Galaxy Camera 2 - The 21x zoom (up to 483mm) is fantastic for distant subjects, but slower AF and reduced image quality at telephoto focal lengths temper enthusiasm.
Sports Photography
- Canon S120 - Faster continuous shooting (12 FPS) and AF tracking are definite pluses; sensor and lens restrict some potential in fast action.
- Galaxy Camera 2 - 5 FPS burst shooting and slower contrast detect AF make capturing fast action more challenging.
Street Photography
- Canon S120 - Small, stealthy, quick controls; very suitable for candid street shooting.
- Galaxy Camera 2 - Bulky and screen-focused - discreetness compromised.
Macro Photography
- Canon S120 - Close focusing down to 3cm combined with fast lens delivers nice macro shots with good detail.
- Galaxy Camera 2 - 10cm minimum focusing distance means you miss out on extreme macro work.
Night/Astro Photography
- Canon S120 - Good low-light ISO up to 12800, with better noise control than the Galaxy model thanks to sensor size.
- Galaxy Camera 2 - Max native ISO 3200 with poorer noise performance restricts night shooting options.
Video Capabilities
- Canon S120 - 1080/60p smooth video, but no mic input.
- Galaxy Camera 2 - 1080/30p video, but with a microphone port and Android apps for editing and sharing.
Travel Photography
- Canon S120 - Compact, light, solid image quality, and good battery life make it excellent for travelers.
- Galaxy Camera 2 - Versatile zoom and GPS, excellent connectivity, but size and weight may be limiting.
Professional Work
- Canon S120 - RAW support and manual controls offer creative freedom, useful as a backup or casual pro camera.
- Galaxy Camera 2 - No RAW files and Android limitations reduce suitability for professionals demanding high workflow integration.
Final Head-to-Head Ratings
Bringing all this together, here’s a snapshot performance summary based on extensive lab and field testing:
And here’s a genre-specific breakdown for more nuanced decision-making:
Pros and Cons Quick Recap
Canon PowerShot S120
Pros:
- Larger sensor & better image quality
- Bright f/1.8 lens wide end for low light and bokeh
- Fast 12 FPS continuous shooting with AF tracking
- Well-designed physical controls for quick access
- RAW support for post-processing
- Compact, pocketable size and weight
Cons:
- Only 5x zoom (limited reach)
- No external mic port for video
- Fixed LCD screen, no tilting
- Moderate battery life (230 shots)
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
Pros:
- Massive 21x zoom lens (483mm equiv.)
- Big 4.8-inch high-res touchscreen with Android OS
- Built-in GPS, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC for connectivity
- Interchangeable with smartphone use and apps
- Longer battery life (~400 shots)
Cons:
- Smaller sensor, more noise and less dynamic range
- Slower autofocus, no continuous AF or tracking
- No RAW support (JPEG only)
- Bulky body less suited for quick shooting
- Confined macro focusing distance (10cm)
- Non-removable battery
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
If you’re a photographer who values true photographic controls, superior image quality, and versatility in a compact size - especially if you shoot portraits, landscapes, or need a capable backup camera for professional use - Canon S120 is the sensible choice. Its excellent lens, faster continuous shooting, and RAW capture ensure you get the image quality you expect from a serious compact camera.
On the flip side, if your priority is zoom reach and connectivity, and you want a camera that feels like a smartphone with added photographic punch, the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 offers a unique proposition. Great for tripodsupported wildlife or travel zoom shots combined with easy photo sharing, plus GPS tagging, but with compromises in image fidelity and manual control.
Wrapping Up: Which Compact Sensor Camera Wins?
Putting myself in your shoes (and wallet), the Canon S120 delivers better all-around performance for photographers, while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 leans towards content creators who value social sharing, zoom versatility, and Android app integration over image quality nuances.
Both have dated by now, but careful buying on secondhand markets can still yield fantastic value, especially for those wanting a compact camera that feels more purposeful than a smartphone.
I recommend the Canon S120 for enthusiasts who want a genuine pocket camera that shoots fast, sharp, and beautiful images. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 is better for tech lovers prioritizing long zoom and smart features - even if it means settling for lesser image quality and slower autofocus.
A Gallery of Sample Images for Your Reference
Here are some sample images I shot with both cameras across different conditions - observe the differences in sharpness, noise, and color depth.
I hope this comparison helps you pick the compact camera that fits your style and workflow best. Happy shooting!
Disclosure: All impressions and photos come from extensive hands-on testing using my industry-standard evaluation rig and real-world scenarios across varied lighting and genres.
Canon S120 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S120 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S120 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-11-26 | 2014-01-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 6 | 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT PureColor II G Touch screen LCD | HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 3.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 or 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 217 grams (0.48 lbs) | 283 grams (0.62 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 29mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.9 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 246 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 shots | 400 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | Built-in |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $449 | $400 |