Clicky

Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z33

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
41
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot S200 front
 
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front
Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Key Specs

Canon S200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
  • 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
  • Announced February 2014
Casio EX-Z33
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
  • Announced August 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Overview

Below, we are analyzing the Canon S200 versus Casio EX-Z33, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Casio. The resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the EX-Z33 (10MP) is very close but the S200 (1/1.7") and EX-Z33 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The S200 was unveiled 4 years later than the EX-Z33 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the S200 grades against the EX-Z33 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Casio EX-Z33

 S200 EX-Z33 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014August 2009More recent by 55 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution461k230kClearer display (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Canon S200

 EX-Z33 S200 

Common features in the Canon S200 and Casio EX-Z33

 S200 EX-Z33 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon S200 has physical dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z33 has sizing of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs).

Contrast the Canon S200 versus Casio EX-Z33 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the S200 compared to the EX-Z33.

Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and EX-Z33 is 93 and 97 respectively.

Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 top view buttons comparison

Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200 and EX-Z33.

All in all, both cameras have got the exact same megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The S200 has the larger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field easier. The younger S200 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 sensor size comparison

Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon S200 Portrait photography features
Casio EX-Z33 Portrait photography features
34
focusing manually
comes with face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
low resolution (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
no RAW support
26
you can focus manually
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Canon S200 Street photography highlights
Casio EX-Z33 Street photography highlights
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with touch focus
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
no RAW support
55
lighter than competition in class (106g)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Canon S200 Sports photography advice
Casio EX-Z33 Sports photography advice
32
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
terrible battery (200 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
16
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Canon S200 as a Travel photography camera
Casio EX-Z33 as a Travel photography camera
64
comes with touch focus
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
no Timelapse function
terrible battery (200 CIPA)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
56
lighter than competition in class (106g)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse mode
low megapixels (10MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon S200
Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z33
46
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
no RAW support
terrible battery (200 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
27
you can focus manually
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S200 as a Vlogging camera
Casio EX-Z33 as a Vlogging camera
33
quite wide (24mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone port
25
lighter than competition in class (106 grams)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z33 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S200 and Casio EX-Z33
 Canon PowerShot S200Casio Exilim EX-Z33
General Information
Brand Name Canon Casio
Model type Canon PowerShot S200 Casio Exilim EX-Z33
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2014-02-21 2009-08-31
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Digic 5 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 6400 1600
Min native ISO 80 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-120mm (5.0x) 36-107mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-5.9 f/3.1-5.6
Macro focusing distance 3cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.5 inches
Screen resolution 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.00 m 2.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 181g (0.40 lbs) 106g (0.23 lbs)
Dimensions 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 200 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-6LH NP-82
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $293 $120