Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z35
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Canon S200 and Casio EX-Z35, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Canon and Casio. The resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the EX-Z35 (12MP) is relatively close but the S200 (1/1.7") and EX-Z35 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S200 was introduced 4 years later than the EX-Z35 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Canon S200 being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the S200 scores against the EX-Z35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot S200 and Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The whole galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery and Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Casio EX-Z35
S200 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | February 2010 | Fresher by 49 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Canon S200
EX-Z35 | S200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Casio EX-Z35
S200 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Canon S200 enjoys outer measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z35 has specifications of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Canon S200 and Casio EX-Z35 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the S200 compared to the EX-Z35.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200 and EX-Z35 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing specs. The visual underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the S200 and EX-Z35.
All in all, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S200 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Casio EX-Z35 will provide you with more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern S200 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon S200 vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Casio |
Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2014-02-21 | 2010-02-21 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 5 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 3.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 181g (0.40 lbs) | 124g (0.27 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6LH | NP-82 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $293 | $99 |