Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Released August 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) is fairly close but the S200 (1/1.7") and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S200 was introduced 3 years after the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the S200 scores against the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S200 and Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon S200 Gallery and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| S200 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 43 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Canon S200
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1150k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+689k dot) |
Common features in the Canon S200 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| S200 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Canon S200 features outer measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has specifications of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the S200 and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S200 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
As you can see, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixel count but different sensor dimensions. The S200 uses the larger sensor which should make getting bokeh simpler. The fresher S200 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-02-21 | 2010-08-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 8cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 1,150 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 3.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181 grams (0.40 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $293 | $900 |