Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Z35
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
95 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Revealed July 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Z35 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Z35, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Canon and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) is fairly close but the S200 (1/1.7") and Fujifilm Z35 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S200 was revealed 4 years later than the Fujifilm Z35 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the S200 matches up vs the Fujifilm Z35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Z35 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S200 and Fujifilm FinePix Z35. The full galleries are viewable at Canon S200 Gallery and Fujifilm Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Fujifilm Z35
| S200 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 56 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Canon S200
| Fujifilm Z35 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Fujifilm Z35
| S200 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Z35 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon S200 features external measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Fujifilm Z35 has dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Z35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the S200 compared to the Fujifilm Z35.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200 and Fujifilm Z35 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Z35 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200 and Fujifilm Z35.
Plainly, the two cameras come with the identical megapixel count but not the same sensor sizing. The S200 includes the larger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult. The more recent S200 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon S200 vs Fujifilm Z35 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-21 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 8cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 3 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 181 grams (0.40 pounds) | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $293 | $130 |