Canon S200 vs Kodak C135
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Canon S200 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon S200 vs Kodak C135 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Canon S200 versus Kodak C135, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and C135 (14MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and C135 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S200 was announced 2 years later than the C135 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the S200 matches up versus the C135 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon S200 vs Kodak C135 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 & Kodak EasyShare C135. The whole galleries are provided at Canon S200 Gallery & Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Kodak C135
| S200 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 26 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 112k | Clearer display (+349k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Canon S200
| C135 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Kodak C135
| S200 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Canon S200 enjoys outside measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Kodak C135 has measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Canon S200 versus Kodak C135 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the S200 and the C135.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S200 and C135 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200 and C135.
Plainly, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S200 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Kodak C135 will give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos much more aggressively. The newer S200 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon S200 vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2014-02-21 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1250 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.4" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 112k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 181 gr (0.40 lbs) | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $293 | $0 |