Clicky

Canon S200 vs Kodak M530

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
41
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot S200 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M530 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26

Canon S200 vs Kodak M530 Key Specs

Canon S200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
  • 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Kodak M530
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon S200 vs Kodak M530 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Canon S200 versus Kodak M530, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. The resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the M530 (12MP) is fairly close but the S200 (1/1.7") and M530 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The S200 was introduced 4 years after the M530 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the S200 grades against the M530 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Kodak M530

 S200 M530 
RevealedFebruary 2014January 2010Newer by 51 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution461k230kClearer display (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Canon S200

 M530 S200 

Common features in the Canon S200 and Kodak M530

 S200 M530 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Canon S200 vs Kodak M530 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon S200 offers physical dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Kodak M530 has sizing of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Check out the Canon S200 versus Kodak M530 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the S200 compared to the M530.

Canon S200 vs Kodak M530 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S200 and M530 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Canon S200 vs Kodak M530 top view buttons comparison

Canon S200 vs Kodak M530 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200 and M530.

As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S200 with its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Kodak M530 will result in greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern S200 will have a benefit in sensor technology.

Canon S200 vs Kodak M530 sensor size comparison

Canon S200 vs Kodak M530 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S200 vs Kodak M530 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon S200
Portrait photography with Kodak M530
34
focusing manually
offers face detect focus
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
lacks RAW format
21
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Canon S200 Street photography factors
Kodak M530 Street photography factors
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers focus by touch
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/1.7")
lacks RAW format
47
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
low max ISO (1,000)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Canon S200 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak M530 as a Sports photography camera
32
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
low battery power (200 shots)
lacks phase detect auto focus
17
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Canon S200 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak M530 as a Travel photography camera
64
offers focus by touch
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
missing Time Lapse mode
low battery power (200 shots)
low megapixels (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
58
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f)
no Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (36mm)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Canon S200 Landscape photography features
Kodak M530 Landscape photography features
46
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
lacks RAW format
low battery power (200 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse mode
27
good maximum aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,000)
no RAW files
no Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S200 Vlogging details
Kodak M530 Vlogging details
33
quite wide (24mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic support
25
good maximum aperture (f)
wide angle not great (36mm)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon S200 vs Kodak M530 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S200 and Kodak M530
 Canon PowerShot S200Kodak EasyShare M530
General Information
Make Canon Kodak
Model Canon PowerShot S200 Kodak EasyShare M530
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2014-02-21 2010-01-05
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Digic 5 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 6400 1000
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-120mm (5.0x) 36-108mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 3cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 461 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 1/8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1400s
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.00 m 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 181 gr (0.40 lbs) 150 gr (0.33 lbs)
Dimensions 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 200 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-6LH KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $293 $110