Clicky

Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
41
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot S200 front
 
Kodak EasyShare Z980 front
Portability
68
Imaging
35
Features
40
Overall
37

Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Key Specs

Canon S200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
  • 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
  • Released February 2014
Kodak Z980
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
  • Launched January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Overview

The following is a extensive analysis of the Canon S200 versus Kodak Z980, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Kodak. The image resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the Z980 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the S200 (1/1.7") and Z980 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The S200 was released 5 years after the Z980 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the S200 grades vs the Z980 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Kodak Z980

 S200 Z980 
LaunchedFebruary 2014January 2009Newer by 63 months
Screen resolution461k201kClearer screen (+260k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Canon S200

 Z980 S200 

Common features in the Canon S200 and Kodak Z980

 S200 Z980 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon S200 has external dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Kodak Z980 has specifications of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).

Contrast the Canon S200 versus Kodak Z980 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the S200 compared to the Z980.

Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and Z980 is 93 and 68 respectively.

Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 top view buttons comparison

Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The image below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200 and Z980.

To sum up, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S200 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Kodak Z980 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The younger S200 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 sensor size comparison

Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon S200 Portrait photography information
Kodak Z980 Portrait photography information
34
has manual focus
offers face detection focusing
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have RAW support
41
manual focus
saves RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Canon S200 Street photography highlights
Kodak Z980 Street photography highlights
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports focus by touch
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have RAW support
54
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Canon S200 Sports photography advice
Kodak Z980 Sports photography advice
32
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
max frames per second very slow (2.0 fps)
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
bad battery pack (200 shots)
doesn't have phase detect AF
34
excellent zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Canon S200 Travel photography highlights
Kodak Z980 Travel photography highlights
64
supports focus by touch
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
doesn't have Timelapse function
bad battery pack (200 shots)
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
51
flash built-in
relatively wide (26mm)
long zoom (624mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon S200
Landscape photography with Kodak Z980
46
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have RAW support
bad battery pack (200 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse function
45
manual focus
relatively wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon S200
Vlogging with Kodak Z980
33
pretty wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
23
relatively wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S200 and Kodak Z980
 Canon PowerShot S200Kodak EasyShare Z980
General Information
Make Canon Kodak
Model Canon PowerShot S200 Kodak EasyShare Z980
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2014-02-21 2009-01-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 5 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-120mm (5.0x) 26-624mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-5.9 f/2.8-5.0
Macro focus range 3cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 461k dots 201k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m 6.30 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 181g (0.40 lb) 445g (0.98 lb)
Dimensions 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 200 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-6LH 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $293 $249