Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
68 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Launched January 2009
Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Canon S200 versus Kodak Z980, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Kodak. The image resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the Z980 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the S200 (1/1.7") and Z980 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S200 was released 5 years after the Z980 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the S200 grades vs the Z980 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot S200 and Kodak EasyShare Z980. The complete galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery and Kodak Z980 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Kodak Z980
S200 | Z980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | January 2009 | Newer by 63 months | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 201k | Clearer screen (+260k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Canon S200
Z980 | S200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Kodak Z980
S200 | Z980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon S200 has external dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Kodak Z980 has specifications of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Contrast the Canon S200 versus Kodak Z980 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the S200 compared to the Z980.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and Z980 is 93 and 68 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The image below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200 and Z980.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S200 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Kodak Z980 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The younger S200 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon S200 vs Kodak Z980 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S200 | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Kodak |
Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Kodak EasyShare Z980 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-02-21 | 2009-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 461k dots | 201k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 181g (0.40 lb) | 445g (0.98 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6LH | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $293 | $249 |