Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
![Canon PowerShot S200 front Canon PowerShot S200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-S200/Canon-S200-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix P7700 front Nikon Coolpix P7700 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-P7700/Nikon-P7700-front.jpg)
82 Imaging
37 Features
70 Overall
50
Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 392g - 119 x 73 x 50mm
- Launched May 2013
- Previous Model is Nikon P7100
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Canon and Nikon. The image resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the P7700 (12MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/1.7").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The S200 was brought out 9 months after the P7700 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the S200 grades vs the P7700 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S200 and Nikon Coolpix P7700. The entire galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery and Nikon P7700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Nikon P7700
S200 | P7700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | May 2013 | Newer by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Nikon P7700 over the Canon S200
P7700 | S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Canon S200 and Nikon P7700
S200 | P7700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon S200 comes with exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Nikon P7700 has measurements of 119mm x 73mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") along with a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the S200 compared to the P7700.
![Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 size comparison Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S200-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S200 and P7700 is 93 and 82 respectively.
![Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 top view buttons comparison Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S200-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The image underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200 and P7700.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Nikon P7700 to produce extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger S200 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
![Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 sensor size comparison Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S200-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S200-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P7700-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon S200 vs Nikon P7700 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S200 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Nikon |
Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-02-21 | 2013-05-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 181 grams (0.40 lbs) | 392 grams (0.86 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 119 x 73 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 53 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 191 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 pictures | 330 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-6LH | EN-EL14 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $293 | $499 |