Canon S200 vs Olympus FE-4030
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Canon S200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Launched January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon S200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Canon S200 versus Olympus FE-4030, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and FE-4030 (14MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and FE-4030 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S200 was manufactured 4 years later than the FE-4030 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the S200 scores vs the FE-4030 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon S200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 & Olympus FE-4030. The entire galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery & Olympus FE-4030 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus FE-4030
| S200 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 51 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Canon S200
| FE-4030 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus FE-4030
| S200 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon S200 features outer measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-4030 has dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon S200 versus Olympus FE-4030 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the S200 compared to the FE-4030.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the S200 and FE-4030 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The graphic below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200 and FE-4030.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The S200 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus FE-4030 will give more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The younger S200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon S200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon S200 vs Olympus FE-4030 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus FE-4030 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus FE-4030 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-02-21 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 181g (0.40 lbs) | 146g (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $293 | $130 |