Canon S200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Canon S200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Old Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Successor is Olympus SP-610UZ
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon S200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Canon S200 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the SP-600 UZ (12MP) is fairly similar but the S200 (1/1.7") and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S200 was released 4 years after the SP-600 UZ which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the S200 grades against the SP-600 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon S200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S200 and Olympus SP-600 UZ. The complete galleries are provided at Canon S200 Gallery and Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
| S200 | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 50 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Canon S200
| SP-600 UZ | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
| S200 | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon S200 has got outer dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Olympus SP-600 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check the Canon S200 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the S200 and the SP-600 UZ.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and SP-600 UZ is 93 and 69 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The pic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S200 and SP-600 UZ.
To sum up, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The S200 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus SP-600 UZ will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent S200 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon S200 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-02-21 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 181g (0.40 lb) | 455g (1.00 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $293 | $189 |