Canon S200 vs Olympus SZ-10
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
90 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
Canon S200 vs Olympus SZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Announced February 2011
Photography Glossary Canon S200 vs Olympus SZ-10 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Canon S200 versus Olympus SZ-10, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and SZ-10 (14MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and SZ-10 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S200 was introduced 3 years later than the SZ-10 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the S200 grades against the SZ-10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon S200 vs Olympus SZ-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 & Olympus SZ-10. The whole galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery & Olympus SZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus SZ-10
| S200 | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | February 2011 | Fresher by 37 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Canon S200
| SZ-10 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus SZ-10
| S200 | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Canon S200 vs Olympus SZ-10 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon S200 offers outside dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-10 has proportions of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Look at the Canon S200 versus Olympus SZ-10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the S200 against the SZ-10.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200 and SZ-10 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus SZ-10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching specs. The graphic below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200 and SZ-10.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S200 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus SZ-10 will render greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent S200 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon S200 vs Olympus SZ-10 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus SZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus SZ-10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-02-21 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.1-4.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 7.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181 grams (0.40 lbs) | 215 grams (0.47 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $293 | $300 |