Canon S200 vs Olympus 9000
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37


92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Canon S200 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 9000

Canon S200 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Canon S200 vs Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly similar but the S200 (1/1.7") and 9000 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.

The S200 was released 4 years after the 9000 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the S200 scores vs the 9000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Canon S200 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S200 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon S200 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus 9000
S200 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 59 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Canon S200
9000 | S200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus 9000
S200 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Canon S200 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon S200 enjoys external dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Canon S200 vs Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the S200 compared to the 9000.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S200 and 9000 is 93 and 92 respectively.

Canon S200 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S200 and 9000.
Clearly, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The S200 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus 9000 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher S200 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Canon S200 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S200 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also referred to as | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-02-21 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 181 grams (0.40 pounds) | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6LH | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $293 | $300 |