Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Canon S200 versus Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty similar but the S200 (1/1.7") and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S200 was launched 4 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the S200 scores versus the Tough-3000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot S200 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| S200 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | January 2010 | More recent by 51 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Canon S200
| Tough-3000 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus Tough-3000
| S200 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon S200 has physical dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Canon S200 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the S200 and the Tough-3000.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and Tough-3000 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specs. The photograph below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200 and Tough-3000.
All in all, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S200 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus Tough-3000 will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger S200 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Also called | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2014-02-21 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 181g (0.40 lbs) | 159g (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $293 | $0 |