Clicky

Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
41
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot S200 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
26
Overall
30

Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs

Canon S200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
  • 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
  • Announced February 2014
Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview

Below, we will be matching up the Canon S200 versus Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty similar but the S200 (1/1.7") and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The S200 was launched 4 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the S200 scores versus the Tough-3000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus Tough-3000

 S200 Tough-3000 
LaunchedFebruary 2014January 2010More recent by 51 months
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kClearer screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Canon S200

 Tough-3000 S200 

Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus Tough-3000

 S200 Tough-3000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon S200 has physical dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Canon S200 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the S200 and the Tough-3000.

Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and Tough-3000 is 93 and 94 respectively.

Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison

Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specs. The photograph below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200 and Tough-3000.

All in all, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S200 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus Tough-3000 will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger S200 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison

Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon S200 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus Tough-3000 Portrait photography highlights
34
you can focus manually
offers face detection focusing
external flash not possible
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
lack of RAW format
20
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Canon S200 Street photography information
Olympus Tough-3000 Street photography information
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes touch focus
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
lack of RAW format
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Canon S200 Sports photography factors
Olympus Tough-3000 Sports photography factors
31
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
terrible battery (200 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
35
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
weather proofing
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon S200 Travel photography factors
Olympus Tough-3000 Travel photography factors
64
includes touch focus
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
terrible battery (200 per charge)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
61
weather proofing
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
MP count low (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Canon S200 Landscape photography details
Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography details
46
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
lack of RAW format
terrible battery (200 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
35
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S200 Vlogging information
Olympus Tough-3000 Vlogging information
33
reasonably wide (24mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
28
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon S200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S200 and Olympus Tough-3000
 Canon PowerShot S200Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot S200 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
Also called - mju Tough 3000
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Announced 2014-02-21 2010-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 5 TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Min native ISO 80 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-120mm (5.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture f/2.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing distance 3cm 2cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 461 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.00 m 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 181g (0.40 lbs) 159g (0.35 lbs)
Dimensions 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 200 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-6LH -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $293 $0