Canon S200 vs Olympus 6000
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Canon S200 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon S200 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Canon S200 vs Olympus 6000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is pretty close but the S200 (1/1.7") and 6000 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S200 was manufactured 4 years after the 6000 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the S200 scores against the 6000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon S200 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot S200 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The entire galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery and Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus 6000
| S200 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 57 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Canon S200
| 6000 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus 6000
| S200 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Canon S200 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon S200 provides outside measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6000 has dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check out the Canon S200 vs Olympus 6000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the S200 vs the 6000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the S200 and 6000 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The pic below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200 and 6000.
All in all, both of these cameras have got the exact same MP albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The S200 uses the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult. The younger S200 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon S200 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon S200 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
| Alternate name | - | mju Tough 6000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-21 | 2009-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 1/4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 181g (0.40 lb) | 179g (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $293 | $259 |