Canon S200 vs Olympus 8010
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Canon S200 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Announced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 8010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon S200 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Canon S200 vs Olympus 8010, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and 8010 (13MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and 8010 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe S200 was revealed 4 years after the 8010 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the S200 scores vs the 8010 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon S200 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The full galleries are viewable at Canon S200 Gallery and Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus 8010
| S200 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 50 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Canon S200
| 8010 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus 8010
| S200 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Canon S200 provides external dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Olympus 8010 has specifications of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Canon S200 vs Olympus 8010 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the S200 and the 8010.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the S200 and 8010 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing specifications. The picture below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200 and 8010.
To sum up, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The S200 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus 8010 will provide greater detail because of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer S200 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon S200 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon S200 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
| Also called | - | mju Tough 8010 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2014-02-21 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 1/4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181 gr (0.40 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $293 | $600 |