Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-5
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
90 Imaging
37 Features
51 Overall
42
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Released May 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-4
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-6
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Canon S200 and Olympus TG-5, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the TG-5 (12MP) is very well matched but the S200 (1/1.7") and TG-5 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S200 was introduced 4 years before the TG-5 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the S200 matches up vs the TG-5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 and Olympus Tough TG-5. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon S200 Gallery and Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus TG-5
| S200 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Canon S200
| TG-5 | S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 | February 2014 | More recent by 39 months |
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus TG-5
| S200 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Canon S200 offers physical dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Olympus TG-5 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Canon S200 and Olympus TG-5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the S200 vs the TG-5.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200 and TG-5 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S200 and TG-5.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The S200 having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-5 will resolve more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The older S200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2014-02-21 | 2017-05-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181g (0.40 lb) | 250g (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photographs | 340 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $293 | $449 |