Canon S200 vs Olympus VG-160
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Canon S200 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon S200 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Canon S200 versus Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and VG-160 (14MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and VG-160 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe S200 was revealed 2 years after the VG-160 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the S200 grades against the VG-160 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon S200 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S200 and Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus VG-160
| S200 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 26 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Canon S200
| VG-160 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus VG-160
| S200 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon S200 enjoys outside dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Canon S200 versus Olympus VG-160 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the S200 vs the VG-160.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S200 and VG-160 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The image here will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200 and VG-160.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The S200 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus VG-160 will resolve greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher S200 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon S200 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon S200 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-02-21 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 181g (0.40 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 images | 165 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $293 | $90 |