Clicky

Canon S200 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
41
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot S200 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55

Canon S200 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Canon S200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
  • 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
  • Announced February 2014
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Launched April 2013
  • Successor is Ricoh GR II
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon S200 vs Ricoh GR Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Canon S200 and Ricoh GR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and GR (16MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and GR (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The S200 was announced 11 months later than the GR so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Canon S200 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the S200 grades vs the GR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

				

Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Ricoh GR

 S200 GR 
LaunchedFebruary 2014April 2013More recent by 11 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Canon S200

 GR S200 
Display resolution1230k461kCrisper display (+769k dot)

Common features in the Canon S200 and Ricoh GR

 S200 GR 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Canon S200 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon S200 offers outside measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Contrast the Canon S200 and Ricoh GR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the S200 vs the GR.

Canon S200 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and GR is 93 and 90 respectively.

Canon S200 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Canon S200 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

Often, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by looking through specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the S200 and GR.

All in all, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S200 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GR will render more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger S200 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon S200 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Canon S200 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S200 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon S200 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GR Portrait photography info
34
manual focus
provides face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
lack of RAW support
74
focusing manually
flash sync speed is above average (1/4,000s)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Canon S200 Street photography info
Ricoh GR Street photography info
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes focus by touch
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
lack of RAW support
74
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lighter than average in class (245 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Canon S200 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR as a Sports photography camera
31
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
bad battery power (200 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
45
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (28mm)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
lack of phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon S200 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR as a Travel photography camera
64
includes focus by touch
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
missing Timelapse recording
bad battery power (200 per charge)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
71
lighter than average in class (245 grams)
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon S200
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR
46
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
lack of RAW support
bad battery power (200 CIPA)
missing Timelapse recording
61
focusing manually
screen size is decent (3")
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon S200
Vlogging with Ricoh GR
33
really wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone jack
30
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (245 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
missing microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon S200 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S200 and Ricoh GR
 Canon PowerShot S200Ricoh GR
General Information
Company Canon Ricoh
Model Canon PowerShot S200 Ricoh GR
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2014-02-21 2013-04-17
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Digic 5 -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 6400 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-120mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/2.0-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 3cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 300s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 181g (0.40 pounds) 245g (0.54 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 78
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.5
DXO Low light score not tested 972
Other
Battery life 200 photographs 290 photographs
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-6LH DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD, SDHC, SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $293 $971