Canon S200 vs Samsung CL5
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
95 Imaging
31 Features
14 Overall
24
Canon S200 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL10
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon S200 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon S200 and Samsung CL5, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Canon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the CL5 (9MP) is relatively close but the S200 (1/1.7") and CL5 (1/2.5") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S200 was launched 5 years later than the CL5 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Canon S200 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the S200 scores against the CL5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon S200 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot S200 and Samsung CL5. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon S200 Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Samsung CL5
| S200 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | February 2009 | Fresher by 61 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Canon S200
| CL5 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Samsung CL5
| S200 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Canon S200 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon S200 offers exterior measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Samsung CL5 has dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Canon S200 and Samsung CL5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the S200 vs the CL5.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and CL5 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to see the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing technical specs. The photograph here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200 and CL5.
As you can tell, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S200 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Canon S200 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger S200 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon S200 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Samsung CL5 |
| Also called as | - | PL10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-02-21 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181 grams (0.40 pounds) | 141 grams (0.31 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $293 | $391 |