Canon S200 vs Samsung HZ35W
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37


91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Canon S200 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650

Canon S200 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Canon S200 vs Samsung HZ35W, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. The resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is pretty close but the S200 (1/1.7") and HZ35W (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.

The S200 was released 3 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the S200 matches up vs the HZ35W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Canon S200 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot S200 and Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Samsung HZ35W
S200 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | June 2010 | More modern by 45 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Canon S200
HZ35W | S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer screen (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Canon S200 and Samsung HZ35W
S200 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Canon S200 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon S200 has got exterior measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon S200 vs Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the S200 against the HZ35W.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S200 and HZ35W is 93 and 91 respectively.

Canon S200 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the S200 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The S200 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung HZ35W will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The younger S200 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.

Canon S200 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S200 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Canon PowerShot S200 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Samsung HZ35W |
Other name | - | WB650 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-02-21 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 181 gr (0.40 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6LH | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $293 | $300 |