Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f3a1/8f3a106acf682ff57f3644acf6ccdfb862e6924d" alt="Canon PowerShot S200 front Canon PowerShot S200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df693/df69387fe87eac181e86e6c666e2ea860e4d4ffa" alt="Samsung PL200 front Samsung PL200 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Lets look closer at the Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Canon and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and PL200 (14MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and PL200 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The S200 was brought out 3 years later than the PL200 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the S200 scores vs the PL200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S200 and Samsung PL200. The entire galleries are provided at Canon S200 Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Samsung PL200
S200 | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 44 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Canon S200
PL200 | S200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Samsung PL200
S200 | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Canon S200 provides exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the S200 vs the PL200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76918/76918d46c1dc3a7de008e0119f26f5fe5e1732d5" alt="Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 size comparison Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the S200 and PL200 is 93 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1470f/1470f6b269499304a82d145503f699e7563b4541" alt="Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison"
Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The visual here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S200 and PL200.
To sum up, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S200 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung PL200 will render more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer S200 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87150/8715026228e2fd14472e66f8247b253806a614ae" alt="Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison"
Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a0fd/2a0fd89cc2630be5e139a701c09b5d08c95e4065" alt="Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon S200 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S200 | Samsung PL200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Samsung PL200 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-02-21 | 2010-07-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 181 grams (0.40 lb) | 170 grams (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6LH | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $293 | $0 |