Canon S200 vs Samsung ST600
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
95 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Canon S200 vs Samsung ST600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 150g - 104 x 60 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon S200 vs Samsung ST600 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Canon S200 vs Samsung ST600, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and ST600 (14MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and ST600 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S200 was unveiled 4 years after the ST600 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon S200 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST600 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the S200 matches up against the ST600 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Canon S200 vs Samsung ST600 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S200 & Samsung ST600. The full galleries are viewable at Canon S200 Gallery & Samsung ST600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Samsung ST600
| S200 | ST600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | January 2010 | Newer by 51 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST600 over the Canon S200
| ST600 | S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1152k | 461k | Crisper display (+691k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon S200 and Samsung ST600
| S200 | ST600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon S200 vs Samsung ST600 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and size. The Canon S200 offers external measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Samsung ST600 has specifications of 104mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Canon S200 vs Samsung ST600 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the S200 versus the ST600.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S200 and ST600 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Samsung ST600 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The pic below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S200 and ST600.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S200 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung ST600 will offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The fresher S200 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon S200 vs Samsung ST600 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon S200 vs Samsung ST600 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Samsung ST600 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Samsung ST600 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-21 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181 gr (0.40 lb) | 150 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 104 x 60 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | SLB07 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $293 | $330 |