Canon S200 vs Samsung ST65
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37


99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Canon S200 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Canon S200 versus Samsung ST65, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and ST65 (14MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and ST65 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.

The S200 was launched 3 years after the ST65 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Canon S200 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the S200 scores vs the ST65 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 and Samsung ST65. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon S200 Gallery and Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Samsung ST65
S200 | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 38 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Canon S200
ST65 | S200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Samsung ST65
S200 | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon S200 features exterior measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon S200 versus Samsung ST65 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the S200 and the ST65.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200 and ST65 is 93 and 99 respectively.

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the S200 and ST65.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The S200 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Samsung ST65 will show more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The younger S200 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S200 | Samsung ST65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Samsung ST65 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2014-02-21 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 181g (0.40 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6LH | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $293 | $130 |