Clicky

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST95

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
41
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot S200 front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
38
Features
19
Overall
30

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Canon S200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
  • 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Released January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Here, we will be evaluating the Canon S200 vs Samsung ST95, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and ST95 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The S200 was revealed 3 years later than the ST95 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Canon S200 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the S200 matches up against the ST95 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Samsung ST95

 S200 ST95 
ReleasedFebruary 2014January 2011More recent by 38 months
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen resolution461k460kClearer screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Canon S200

 ST95 S200 

Common features in the Canon S200 and Samsung ST95

 S200 ST95 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Canon S200 comes with outer dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Contrast the Canon S200 vs Samsung ST95 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the S200 versus the ST95.

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and ST95 is 93 and 99 respectively.

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by checking technical specs. The graphic underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S200 and ST95.

As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S200 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung ST95 will resolve more detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer S200 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon S200
Portrait photography with Samsung ST95
34
you can focus manually
comes with face detection autofocus
no external flash support
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
no RAW support
29
megapixel count good (16MP)
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon S200
Street photography with Samsung ST95
61
image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch focus
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
no RAW support
50
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
low maximum ISO (0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Canon S200 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Sports photography camera
31
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
low resolution (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
bad battery power (200 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
27
megapixel count good (16MP)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon S200 Travel photography highlights
Samsung ST95 Travel photography highlights
64
provides touch focus
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
lack of Timelapse recording
bad battery power (200 per charge)
low resolution (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
71
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
good max aperture (f)
no Timelapse recording
does not have selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Canon S200 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Landscape photography camera
46
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
no RAW support
bad battery power (200 per charge)
lack of Timelapse recording
37
good max aperture (f)
screen size is good (3")
megapixel count good (16MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (0)
has no RAW format
no Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S200 Vlogging advice
Samsung ST95 Vlogging advice
33
quite wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone jack
27
good max aperture (f)
does not have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon S200 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S200 and Samsung ST95
 Canon PowerShot S200Samsung ST95
General Information
Make Canon Samsung
Model Canon PowerShot S200 Samsung ST95
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Revealed 2014-02-21 2011-01-19
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 5 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 -
Lowest native ISO 80 -
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-120mm (5.0x) ()
Largest aperture f/2.0-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 3cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 461k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 181 gr (0.40 lbs) -
Physical dimensions 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 200 photos -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-6LH -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $293 $145