Clicky

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
41
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot S200 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Canon S200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
  • 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
  • Released February 2014
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Here is a in depth overview of the Canon S200 versus Samsung WB35F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and WB35F (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The S200 was brought out 2 months later than the WB35F and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the S200 grades vs the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Samsung WB35F

 S200 WB35F 
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Canon S200

 WB35F S200 

Common features in the Canon S200 and Samsung WB35F

 S200 WB35F 
IntroducedFebruary 2014January 2014Similar age
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon S200 has got physical dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check the Canon S200 versus Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the S200 versus the WB35F.

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the S200 and WB35F is 93 and 93 respectively.

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specs. The visual underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S200 and WB35F.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S200 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Samsung WB35F will give more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively.

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon S200 Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography advice
34
you can focus manually
offers face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
low resolution (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lacks RAW format
37
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon S200 Street photography advice
Samsung WB35F Street photography advice
61
image stabilization (Optical)
offers touch focus
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lacks RAW format
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (194g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon S200
Sports photography with Samsung WB35F
31
image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
low resolution (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
bad battery power (200 shots)
lacks phase detect autofocus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Canon S200 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Travel photography camera
64
offers touch focus
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
does not have Timelapse mode
bad battery power (200 per charge)
low resolution (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
70
lighter than others in class (194g)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
missing Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Canon S200 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography factors
46
you can focus manually
decently wide (24mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lacks RAW format
bad battery power (200 per charge)
does not have Timelapse mode
43
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon S200
Vlogging with Samsung WB35F
33
decently wide (24mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone socket
31
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (194g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S200 and Samsung WB35F
 Canon PowerShot S200Samsung WB35F
General Information
Brand Name Canon Samsung
Model Canon PowerShot S200 Samsung WB35F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2014-02-21 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 5 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-120mm (5.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-5.9 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus distance 3cm -
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 461 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 2.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 181 grams (0.40 pounds) 194 grams (0.43 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 200 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-6LH BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $293 $130