Clicky

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB750

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
41
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot S200 front
 
Samsung WB750 front
Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
50
Overall
42

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs

Canon S200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
  • 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
  • Released February 2014
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
  • Introduced September 2011
Photography Glossary

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB750 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Canon S200 versus Samsung WB750, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and WB750 (13MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and WB750 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The S200 was introduced 2 years later than the WB750 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the S200 scores versus the WB750 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Samsung WB750

 S200 WB750 
IntroducedFebruary 2014September 2011More recent by 31 months
Screen resolution461k460kSharper screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Canon S200

 WB750 S200 

Common features in the Canon S200 and Samsung WB750

 S200 WB750 
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you should consider its weight and size. The Canon S200 enjoys physical dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

See the Canon S200 versus Samsung WB750 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the S200 vs the WB750.

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB750 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S200 and WB750 is 93 and 93 respectively.

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through technical specs. The photograph below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S200 and WB750.

As you have seen, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S200 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB750 will provide you with more detail using its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent S200 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon S200 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Portrait photography camera
34
has manual focus
provides face detection focus
can't use external flash
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lacks RAW files
42
has manual focus
good MP (13 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon S200 Street photography factors
Samsung WB750 Street photography factors
61
image stabilization (Optical)
features touch to focus
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lacks RAW files
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (193g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon S200
Sports photography with Samsung WB750
32
image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
low battery life (200 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
51
excellent zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (13MP)
has tracking focus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Canon S200 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Travel photography camera
64
features touch to focus
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
no Timelapse mode
low battery life (200 shots)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
69
lighter than average (193 grams)
good MP (13 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
great zoom (432mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Canon S200 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB750 Landscape photography factors
46
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lacks RAW files
low battery life (200 shots)
no Timelapse mode
49
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (13MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S200 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB750 Vlogging highlights
33
pretty wide (24mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone socket
34
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (193g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
does not have microphone port
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Canon S200 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S200 and Samsung WB750
 Canon PowerShot S200Samsung WB750
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Samsung
Model Canon PowerShot S200 Samsung WB750
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2014-02-21 2011-09-01
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 5 -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 13 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4096 x 3072
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-120mm (5.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-5.9 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus range 3cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 461k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.00 m 3.30 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 181 grams (0.40 lb) 193 grams (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 200 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-6LH SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail pricing $293 $339