Canon S200 vs Samsung WB850F
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon S200 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon S200 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Canon S200 vs Samsung WB850F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and WB850F (16MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and WB850F (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S200 was manufactured 2 years later than the WB850F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the S200 scores versus the WB850F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon S200 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot S200 and Samsung WB850F. The entire galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery and Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Samsung WB850F
| S200 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Canon S200
| WB850F | S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Canon S200 and Samsung WB850F
| S200 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Canon S200 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Canon S200 provides outside measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB850F has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Canon S200 vs Samsung WB850F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the S200 compared to the WB850F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S200 and WB850F is 93 and 91 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the S200 and WB850F.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S200 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB850F will show extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern S200 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon S200 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Samsung WB850F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-02-21 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 181g (0.40 lb) | 250g (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $293 | $599 |
