Canon S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Canon S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Announced February 2014
Photography Glossary Canon S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Canon S200 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Sigma. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S200 was brought out at a similar time to the DP2 Quattro and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon S200 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the S200 grades against the DP2 Quattro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot S200 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon S200 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| S200 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Canon S200
| DP2 Quattro | S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon S200 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| S200 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | February 2014 | Similar age | |
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Canon S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon S200 has got outside dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon S200 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the S200 against the DP2 Quattro.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and DP2 Quattro is 93 and 70 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking technical specs. The visual underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S200 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S200 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give you greater detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively.
Canon S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon S200 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Sigma |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-02-21 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181 gr (0.40 pounds) | 395 gr (0.87 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $293 | $931 |