Canon S200 vs Sony H20
Portability
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
Portability
87 Imaging
33 Features
29 Overall
31
87 Imaging
33 Features
29 Overall
31
Canon S200 vs Sony H20 Key Specs
Canon S200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced February 2014
Sony H20
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
- 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
- Announced May 2009
Photography Glossary Canon S200 vs Sony H20 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Canon S200 versus Sony H20, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Canon and Sony. The sensor resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the H20 (10MP) is very well matched but the S200 (1/1.7") and H20 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S200 was unveiled 4 years after the H20 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the S200 grades vs the H20 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon S200 vs Sony H20 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20. The full galleries are provided at Canon S200 Gallery & Sony H20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Sony H20
| S200 | H20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 59 months |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H20 over the Canon S200
| H20 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Sony H20
| S200 | H20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Canon S200 vs Sony H20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon S200 has got outer dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Sony H20 has sizing of 107mm x 69mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check the Canon S200 versus Sony H20 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the S200 compared to the H20.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and H20 is 93 and 87 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Sony H20 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200 and H20.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same resolution but not the same sensor sizes. The S200 has got the larger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult. The fresher S200 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Canon S200 vs Sony H20 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon S200 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony H20 as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
features face detect autofocus
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
does not have RAW format
focusing manually
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Canon S200 Street photography advice
Sony H20 Street photography advice
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch focus
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
does not have RAW format
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (250g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Canon S200 Sports photography advice
Sony H20 Sports photography advice
has image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking focus
low fps (2.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
bad battery (200 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Optical)
low fps (2.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Canon S200 Travel photography highlights
Sony H20 Travel photography highlights
provides touch focus
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
missing Time Lapse recording
bad battery (200 per charge)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
flash built-in
long zoom (380mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (250g)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Canon S200 Landscape photography features
Sony H20 Landscape photography features
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
does not have RAW format
bad battery (200 shots)
missing Time Lapse recording
focusing manually
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Canon S200 Vlogging highlights
Sony H20 Vlogging highlights
quite wide (24mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic port
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (250 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon S200 vs Sony H20 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-02-21 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 38-380mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.4 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 7.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181g (0.40 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $293 | $249 |