Canon S200 vs Sony HX9V
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
91 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
Canon S200 vs Sony HX9V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
- Launched July 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon S200 vs Sony HX9V Overview
Below, we are matching up the Canon S200 vs Sony HX9V, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and HX9V (16MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and HX9V (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S200 was revealed 2 years later than the HX9V and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the S200 scores against the HX9V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Canon S200 vs Sony HX9V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V. The full galleries are provided at Canon S200 Gallery and Sony HX9V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Sony HX9V
| S200 | HX9V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | July 2011 | More recent by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX9V over the Canon S200
| HX9V | S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k | 461k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Canon S200 and Sony HX9V
| S200 | HX9V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Sony HX9V Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon S200 enjoys outer measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Sony HX9V has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Canon S200 vs Sony HX9V in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the S200 against the HX9V.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and HX9V is 93 and 91 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Sony HX9V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing specifications. The photograph here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S200 and HX9V.
To sum up, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S200 having a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Sony HX9V will provide you with more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The younger S200 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Sony HX9V Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon S200 vs Sony HX9V Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-02-21 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 181 gr (0.40 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $293 | $328 |