Canon S200 vs Sony W320
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Canon S200 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon S200 vs Sony W320 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Canon S200 vs Sony W320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and W320 (14MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and W320 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S200 was released 4 years after the W320 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon S200 being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the S200 matches up vs the W320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Canon S200 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The complete galleries are provided at Canon S200 Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Sony W320
| S200 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 51 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Canon S200
| W320 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Sony W320
| S200 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Canon S200 offers outer measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Canon S200 vs Sony W320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the S200 against the W320.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and W320 is 93 and 97 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The image below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the S200 and W320.
Plainly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The S200 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Sony W320 will give more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The newer S200 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon S200 vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-21 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181g (0.40 lbs) | 117g (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $293 | $269 |