Canon S200 vs Sony WX350
Portability
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
Portability
94 Imaging
42 Features
43 Overall
42
94 Imaging
42 Features
43 Overall
42
Canon S200 vs Sony WX350 Key Specs
Canon S200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2014
Sony WX350
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 164g - 96 x 55 x 26mm
- Announced February 2014
- Previous Model is Sony WX300
- Later Model is Sony WX500
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon S200 vs Sony WX350 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Canon S200 and Sony WX350, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and Sony. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and WX350 (18MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and WX350 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S200 was revealed about the same time to the WX350 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the S200 grades versus the WX350 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon S200 vs Sony WX350 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot S200 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350. The full galleries are provided at Canon S200 Gallery and Sony WX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Sony WX350
| S200 | WX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX350 over the Canon S200
| WX350 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Sony WX350
| S200 | WX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | February 2014 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon S200 vs Sony WX350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Canon S200 features outside measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Sony WX350 has specifications of 96mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Compare the Canon S200 and Sony WX350 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the S200 compared to the WX350.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the S200 and WX350 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Sony WX350 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out a spec sheet. The pic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S200 and WX350.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S200 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Sony WX350 will show extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively.
Canon S200 vs Sony WX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon S200 Portrait photography advice
Sony WX350 Portrait photography advice
you can focus manually
supports face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
no RAW files
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Canon S200 as a Street photography camera
Sony WX350 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
features focus by touch
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
no RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (164 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Canon S200 as a Sports photography camera
Sony WX350 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
slow frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
not so great battery life (200 shots)
no phase detect autofocus
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery (470 per charge)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Canon S200 Travel photography features
Sony WX350 Travel photography features
features focus by touch
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
does not have Time Lapse recording
not so great battery life (200 shots)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
better than average battery (470 per charge)
lighter than average (164 grams)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Canon S200 Landscape photography factors
Sony WX350 Landscape photography factors
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
no RAW files
not so great battery life (200 shots)
does not have Time Lapse recording
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
better than average battery (470 per charge)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon S200
Vlogging with Sony WX350
really wide (24mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic jack
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (164g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon S200 vs Sony WX350 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-02-21 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.5-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | VCHD: 28M PS(1,920x1,080/60p) / 24M FX(1,920x1,080/60i) / 17M FH(1,920x1,080/60i),MP4: 12M(1,440x1,080/30fps) / 3M VGA(640x480/30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 181g (0.40 lb) | 164g (0.36 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 96 x 55 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photographs | 470 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (Off / 10sec. / 2sec. / portrait1 / portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $293 | $270 |