Canon S90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
92 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon S90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Renewed by Canon S95
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- New Model is Ricoh WG-6
Photography Glossary Canon S90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Canon S90 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the S90 (10MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the S90 (1/1.7") and WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S90 was launched 5 years prior to the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the S90 scores against the WG-5 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon S90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S90 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Canon S90 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S90 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| S90 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Canon S90
| WG-5 GPS | S90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 | April 2010 | Fresher by 58 months |
Common features in the Canon S90 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| S90 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Canon S90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Canon S90 comes with external measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Canon S90 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the S90 and the WG-5 GPS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S90 and WG-5 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Canon S90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the S90 and WG-5 GPS.
Plainly, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S90 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older S90 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon S90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon S90 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S90 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S90 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-04-08 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 14.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/500 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195 gr (0.43 lbs) | 236 gr (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 46 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.0 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 185 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, MMC, MMCplus, HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $599 | $500 |