Canon S90 vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
33 Features
42 Overall
36
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon S90 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Later Model is Canon S95
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon S90 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Canon S90 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the S90 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the S90 (1/1.7") and WB800F (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S90 was introduced 3 years before the WB800F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the S90 matches up vs the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon S90 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S90 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon S90 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S90 over the Samsung WB800F
| S90 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Canon S90
| WB800F | S90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | April 2010 | Fresher by 33 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon S90 and Samsung WB800F
| S90 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Canon S90 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Canon S90 enjoys physical dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Canon S90 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the S90 and the WB800F.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the S90 and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Canon S90 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over specifications. The graphic here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S90 and WB800F.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S90 using its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB800F will deliver more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older S90 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Canon S90 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon S90 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S90 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S90 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-04-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/500s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 195g (0.43 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 46 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.0 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 185 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, MMC, MMCplus, HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $599 | $300 |