Canon S95 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
Canon S95 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Released November 2010
- Replaced the Canon S90
- Updated by Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon S95 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Canon S95 vs Fujifilm F200EXR, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Canon and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the S95 (10MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is pretty close but the S95 (1/1.7") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") posses different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S95 was manufactured 20 months after the Fujifilm F200EXR which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the S95 scores against the Fujifilm F200EXR when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Canon S95 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot S95 & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon S95 Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| S95 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2010 |  | April 2009 | More modern by 20 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Canon S95
| Fujifilm F200EXR | S95 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S95 and Fujifilm F200EXR
| S95 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon S95 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon S95 has got physical dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Fujifilm F200EXR has specifications of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Canon S95 vs Fujifilm F200EXR in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the S95 vs the Fujifilm F200EXR.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S95 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 93 and 93 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by researching specifications. The picture here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S95 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
To sum up, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The S95 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Fujifilm F200EXR will provide you with more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent S95 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Canon S95 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon S95 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S95 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S95 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-11-23 | 2009-04-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195g (0.43 pounds) | 205g (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-6L | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | - | One |
| Cost at launch | $495 | $350 |