Canon S95 vs Fujifilm JZ200
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
95 Imaging
38 Features
30 Overall
34
Canon S95 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Introduced November 2010
- Previous Model is Canon S90
- Successor is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon S95 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Canon S95 versus Fujifilm JZ200, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Canon and FujiFilm. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and Fujifilm JZ200 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S95 was unveiled 13 months prior to the Fujifilm JZ200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the S95 matches up against the Fujifilm JZ200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Canon S95 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot S95 and Fujifilm FinePix JZ200. The full galleries are viewable at Canon S95 Gallery and Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Fujifilm JZ200
| S95 | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Canon S95
| Fujifilm JZ200 | S95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 | November 2010 | Fresher by 13 months |
Common features in the Canon S95 and Fujifilm JZ200
| S95 | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Canon S95 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon S95 enjoys physical measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Fujifilm JZ200 has dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).
Look at the Canon S95 versus Fujifilm JZ200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the S95 vs the Fujifilm JZ200.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the S95 and Fujifilm JZ200 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S95 and Fujifilm JZ200.
Clearly, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S95 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Fujifilm JZ200 will provide more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older S95 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Canon S95 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon S95 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S95 | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S95 | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-11-23 | 2012-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 2.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/500 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195 gr (0.43 pounds) | 135 gr (0.30 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-6L | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | - | One |
| Cost at launch | $495 | $0 |