Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
![Canon PowerShot S95 front Canon PowerShot S95 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-S95/Canon-S95-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare Z915 front Kodak EasyShare Z915 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-EasyShare-Z915.jpg)
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Announced November 2010
- Old Model is Canon S90
- Later Model is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Launched January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Canon S95 versus Kodak Z915, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. The resolution of the S95 (10MP) and the Z915 (10MP) is very comparable but the S95 (1/1.7") and Z915 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The S95 was launched 23 months later than the Z915 making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the S95 grades against the Z915 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S95 & Kodak EasyShare Z915. The complete galleries are available at Canon S95 Gallery & Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Kodak Z915
S95 | Z915 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 23 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Canon S95
Z915 | S95 |
---|
Common features in the Canon S95 and Kodak Z915
S95 | Z915 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Canon S95 provides physical measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Kodak Z915 has sizing of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Canon S95 versus Kodak Z915 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the S95 versus the Z915.
![Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 size comparison Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S95-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z915-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the S95 and Z915 is 93 and 91 respectively.
![Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 top view buttons comparison Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S95-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z915-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out specifications. The photograph below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the S95 and Z915.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same MP but not the same sensor sizing. The S95 uses the larger sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult. The younger S95 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
![Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 sensor size comparison Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S95-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z915-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S95-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-Z915-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Canon S95 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S95 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Kodak |
Model | Canon PowerShot S95 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-11-23 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/1250s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.50 m | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/500s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 195 gr (0.43 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NB-6L | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | - | 1 |
Cost at release | $495 | $200 |