Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Revealed November 2010
- Earlier Model is Canon S90
- Newer Model is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Canon S95 versus Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the S95 (10MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly close but the S95 (1/1.7") and 9000 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S95 was revealed 19 months after the 9000 making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the S95 matches up against the 9000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S95 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The full galleries are provided at Canon S95 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Olympus 9000
S95 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2010 | May 2009 | Newer by 19 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Canon S95
9000 | S95 |
---|
Common features in the Canon S95 and Olympus 9000
S95 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon S95 offers physical measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon S95 versus Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the S95 and the 9000.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S95 and 9000 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specs. The image underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S95 and 9000.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The S95 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus 9000 will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent S95 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also referred to as | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-11-23 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.50 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/500 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 195g (0.43 pounds) | 225g (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 153 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | - | Single |
Launch price | $495 | $300 |