Clicky

Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
93
Imaging
34
Features
42
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot S95 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Canon S95
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
  • Revealed November 2010
  • Earlier Model is Canon S90
  • Newer Model is Canon S100
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Alternative Name is mju 9000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Canon S95 versus Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the S95 (10MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly close but the S95 (1/1.7") and 9000 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The S95 was revealed 19 months after the 9000 making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the S95 matches up against the 9000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Olympus 9000

 S95 9000 
LaunchedNovember 2010May 2009Newer by 19 months
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution461k230kCrisper display (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Canon S95

 9000 S95 

Common features in the Canon S95 and Olympus 9000

 S95 9000 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon S95 offers physical measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon S95 versus Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the S95 and the 9000.

Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S95 and 9000 is 93 and 92 respectively.

Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specs. The image underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S95 and 9000.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The S95 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus 9000 will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent S95 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon S95 Portrait photography info
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography info
40
focusing manually
great flash sync speed (1/500 seconds)
exports RAW formats
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
21
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon S95
Street photography with Olympus 9000
65
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than competition in class (225g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Canon S95 Sports photography info
Olympus 9000 Sports photography info
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Canon S95 Travel photography details
Olympus 9000 Travel photography details
64
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
no Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
58
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
long reach (280mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (225 grams)
low MP (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon S95 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Landscape photography camera
52
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
no Time Lapse function
32
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S95 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
32
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Optical)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic port
27
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (225 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon S95 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S95 and Olympus 9000
 Canon PowerShot S95Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot S95 Olympus Stylus 9000
Also referred to as - mju 9000
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-11-23 2009-05-14
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Digic 4 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 50
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-105mm (3.8x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 461k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1600 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 6.50 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/500 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 195g (0.43 pounds) 225g (0.50 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 47 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 153 not tested
Other
Battery ID NB-6L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Card slots - Single
Launch price $495 $300