Canon S95 vs Olympus 6000
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Canon S95 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Revealed November 2010
- Superseded the Canon S90
- Later Model is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon S95 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Canon S95 vs Olympus 6000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S95 (10MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is fairly close but the S95 (1/1.7") and 6000 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S95 was launched 17 months later than the 6000 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the S95 grades versus the 6000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon S95 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S95 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The complete galleries are provided at Canon S95 Gallery & Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Olympus 6000
| S95 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2010 | July 2009 | Fresher by 17 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Canon S95
| 6000 | S95 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S95 and Olympus 6000
| S95 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Canon S95 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon S95 features external dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus 6000 has sizing of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Canon S95 vs Olympus 6000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the S95 compared to the 6000.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the S95 and 6000 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S95 and 6000.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same MP but not the same sensor sizing. The S95 offers the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF easier. The younger S95 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon S95 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon S95 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 6000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-11-23 | 2009-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/500 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 195g (0.43 lbs) | 179g (0.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | - | One |
| Retail cost | $495 | $259 |