Canon S95 vs Olympus 6020
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Canon S95 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Introduced November 2010
- Replaced the Canon S90
- New Model is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon S95 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Canon S95 and Olympus 6020, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and 6020 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S95 was unveiled 10 months later than the 6020 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the S95 grades against the 6020 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon S95 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S95 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are available at Canon S95 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Olympus 6020
| S95 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2010 | February 2010 | Fresher by 10 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Canon S95
| 6020 | S95 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S95 and Olympus 6020
| S95 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Canon S95 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon S95 has got external measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has proportions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Canon S95 and Olympus 6020 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the S95 and the 6020.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S95 and 6020 is 93 and 95 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing technical specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S95 and 6020.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S95 with its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus 6020 will produce more detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The fresher S95 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon S95 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon S95 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-11-23 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 1/4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/500s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195 gr (0.43 lbs) | 122 gr (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-6L | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | - | 1 |
| Cost at release | $495 | $279 |