Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-320
93 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Revealed November 2010
- Superseded the Canon S90
- Replacement is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and TG-320 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe S95 was launched 13 months prior to the TG-320 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the S95 grades versus the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S95 & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon S95 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Olympus TG-320
S95 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Canon S95
TG-320 | S95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | November 2010 | More recent by 13 months |
Common features in the Canon S95 and Olympus TG-320
S95 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Canon S95 features external dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the S95 against the TG-320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the S95 and TG-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S95 and TG-320.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S95 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-320 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older S95 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus TG-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-11-23 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 4 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.50 m | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/500 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 195 gr (0.43 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-6L | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | - | Single |
Retail pricing | $495 | $0 |