Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-3
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Revealed November 2010
- Previous Model is Canon S90
- Replacement is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-4
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Canon S95 versus Olympus TG-3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and TG-3 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S95 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the TG-3 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the S95 matches up versus the TG-3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot S95 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The entire galleries are provided at Canon S95 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Olympus TG-3
S95 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Canon S95
TG-3 | S95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2014 | November 2010 | Newer by 40 months |
Common features in the Canon S95 and Olympus TG-3
S95 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon S95 has exterior dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon S95 versus Olympus TG-3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the S95 compared to the TG-3.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the S95 and TG-3 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S95 and TG-3.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S95 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-3 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged S95 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-11-23 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 4 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.50 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/500 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 195g (0.43 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-6L | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | - | One |
Cost at release | $495 | $350 |