Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FP2
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Launched January 2010
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Olympus XZ-10 and Panasonic FP2, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the FP2 (14MP) is relatively similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-10 was released 3 years later than the FP2 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-10 matches up versus the FP2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Panasonic FP2
XZ-10 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | January 2010 | Fresher by 38 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus XZ-10
FP2 | XZ-10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Panasonic FP2
XZ-10 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 enjoys exterior measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP2 has specifications of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-10 and Panasonic FP2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-10 against the FP2.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and FP2 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and FP2.
Clearly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Panasonic FP2 to deliver more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern XZ-10 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 151g (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $428 | $80 |