Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-4
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Revealed November 2010
- Previous Model is Canon S90
- Successor is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and TG-4 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe S95 was revealed 5 years before the TG-4 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the S95 scores versus the TG-4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S95 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The full galleries are provided at Canon S95 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Olympus TG-4
| S95 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Canon S95
| TG-4 | S95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 | November 2010 | Fresher by 53 months |
Common features in the Canon S95 and Olympus TG-4
| S95 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon S95 offers physical measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the S95 compared to the TG-4.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S95 and TG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The photograph here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the S95 and TG-4.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S95 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-4 will resolve more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older S95 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-11-23 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/500s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195 grams (0.43 lb) | 247 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | - | 1 |
| Launch cost | $495 | $379 |