Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-5
Portability
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Portability
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
Canon S95
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Introduced November 2010
- Earlier Model is Canon S90
- Later Model is Canon S100
Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-4
- Updated by Olympus TG-6
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Canon S95 versus Olympus TG-5, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the S95 (10MP) and the TG-5 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the S95 (1/1.7") and TG-5 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S95 was launched 7 years before the TG-5 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the S95 matches up vs the TG-5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S95 & Olympus Tough TG-5. The complete galleries are provided at Canon S95 Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Olympus TG-5
| S95 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Canon S95
| TG-5 | S95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 |  | November 2010 | More modern by 78 months |
Common features in the Canon S95 and Olympus TG-5
| S95 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon S95 offers outside measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-5 has measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Canon S95 versus Olympus TG-5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the S95 against the TG-5.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the S95 and TG-5 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading through a spec sheet. The pic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the S95 and TG-5.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The S95 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus TG-5 will give greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged S95 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon S95 Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-5 Portrait photography details
you can focus manually
high flash sync (1/500s)
delivers RAW files
cannot use external flash
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
has manual focus
comes with face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Canon S95 Street photography features
Olympus TG-5 Street photography features
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/1.7")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
environment proofing
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
heavier than competitors (250g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Canon S95 Sports photography advice
Olympus TG-5 Sports photography advice
image stabilization (Optical)
slow frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect autofocus
fast shooting (20.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proofing
great battery pack (340 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Canon S95 Travel photography details
Olympus TG-5 Travel photography details
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
lack of Time Lapse recording
low resolution (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
great battery pack (340 shots)
environment proofing
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competitors (250 grams)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon S95
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-5
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution (10MP)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
lack of Time Lapse recording
has manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
environment proofing
great battery pack (340 CIPA)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Canon S95 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-5 as a Vlogging camera
quite wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Optical)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic socket
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
missing external mic jack
heavier than competitors (250g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon S95 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-11-23 | 2017-05-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/500 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 195g (0.43 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Storage slots | - | One |
| Launch cost | $495 | $449 |