Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-320
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Revealed November 2010
- Old Model is Canon S90
- Refreshed by Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Canon S95 and Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and VR-320 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S95 was brought out 7 months prior to the VR-320 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the S95 grades against the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot S95 & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are available at Canon S95 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Olympus VR-320
| S95 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon S95
| VR-320 | S95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | November 2010 | More modern by 7 months |
Common features in the Canon S95 and Olympus VR-320
| S95 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon S95 enjoys external measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Canon S95 and Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the S95 and the VR-320.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the S95 and VR-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The pic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the S95 and VR-320.
All in all, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The S95 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will render extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged S95 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon S95 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S95 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-11-23 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/500 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 195 grams (0.43 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-6L | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | - | 1 |
| Cost at release | $495 | $179 |