Clicky

Canon S95 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot S95 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Canon S95 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Canon S95
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
  • Revealed November 2010
  • Earlier Model is Canon S90
  • New Model is Canon S100
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Released December 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon S95 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Below is a in-depth assessment of the Canon S95 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the S95 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/1.7").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The S95 was introduced 3 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the S95 grades against the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 S95 XZ-2 iHS 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Canon S95

 XZ-2 iHS S95 
ReleasedDecember 2012November 2010More recent by 25 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution920k461kClearer screen (+459k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Canon S95 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 S95 XZ-2 iHS 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Canon S95 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon S95 provides physical dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

See the Canon S95 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the S95 against the XZ-2 iHS.

Canon S95 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S95 and XZ-2 iHS is 93 and 85 respectively.

Canon S95 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Canon S95 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Normally, its hard to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the S95 and XZ-2 iHS.

Clearly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus XZ-2 iHS to resolve more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older S95 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Canon S95 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Canon S95 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S95 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon S95 Portrait photography info
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography info
41
has manual focus
high flash sync (1/500 seconds)
exports RAW formats
can't use external flash
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
46
has manual focus
comes with face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Canon S95 Street photography details
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography details
65
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
66
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
more heavy than others in class (346 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Canon S95 Sports photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography highlights
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
low fps (1.0 fps)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect autofocus
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
great battery (340 per charge)
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Canon S95 Travel photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography features
64
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
missing Timelapse recording
resolution not great (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
61
great battery (340 shots)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (346g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Canon S95 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
53
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
missing Timelapse recording
55
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
great battery (340 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lack of Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S95 Vlogging highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging highlights
32
quite wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Optical)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone support
36
really wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
includes microphone support
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
more heavy than others in class (346 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon S95 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S95 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Canon PowerShot S95Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Brand Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot S95 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-11-23 2012-12-18
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 4 -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 35
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-105mm (3.8x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing distance 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.8 4.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1600 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 6.50 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/500 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 195 grams (0.43 pounds) 346 grams (0.76 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 47 49
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 20.4
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 11.3
DXO Low light rating 153 216
Other
Battery life - 340 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-6L Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots - 1
Launch price $495 $450